I will provide details, once I've gotten the trip clearer in my head. (I was stupid and didn't write things down. Now I've forgotten what days things happened. Grrr.)
Alas, no photos. Partly this is because D. has a weird inhibiting effect on my photography, partly because the camera is crap, and entirely because the data card became completely unreadable by either camera or computer, for reasons that will probably remain unknown.
Maybe a tour later, when we're moving in next month. :)
It's not trackback spam. Unpartisan.com is a blog aggregator that scans political news feeds and political blog postings, sorting and categorizing them into categories in much the same way that Google News does with regular news. It does this entirely without the aid of a human editor. For example, if Bush makes a speech about the war, the aggregator will gather all stories about the speech and all blog postings related to it, then sort all stories by popularity. It's quite complicated and I'm very proud of it, but sometimes errors are made in categorization (it is a computer, after all, and not a human). I'm still not entirely sure why the algorithm matched this posting to that story, but we're still in beta mode and bugs are being steadily worked out. Thank you for bringing this matter to my attention. For more information, please see the FAQ on Unpartisan.com.
Wonderful, Rana! Happy to hear it.
Posted by:Clancy | 2005.06.28 at 12:15 PM
Congrats! Hope you found a nice place to make Red State life more bearable (it's really not so bad).
Posted by:Angry Pregnant Lawyer | 2005.06.28 at 01:03 PM
Yay! Nice to have you back online!
\*/
Posted by:Daybreak | 2005.06.28 at 01:23 PM
welcome back!
Posted by:JM | 2005.06.28 at 01:29 PM
Wonderful! I'm so glad! Details, details!
So glad that you're back, too!
Posted by:Phantom Scribbler | 2005.06.28 at 01:29 PM
Welcome back! And congrats!
And, blog-whorily, I posted about the helicopter leaves, which I think was talked about here.
Posted by:wolfangel | 2005.06.28 at 01:41 PM
Yay! Details? Photos, even (or is that too much to hope for)?
Posted by:Jill Smith | 2005.06.28 at 02:39 PM
congrats! and yeah, where's the 360 ipix tour? :)
Posted by:brina | 2005.06.28 at 02:45 PM
I will provide details, once I've gotten the trip clearer in my head. (I was stupid and didn't write things down. Now I've forgotten what days things happened. Grrr.)
Alas, no photos. Partly this is because D. has a weird inhibiting effect on my photography, partly because the camera is crap, and entirely because the data card became completely unreadable by either camera or computer, for reasons that will probably remain unknown.
Maybe a tour later, when we're moving in next month. :)
Posted by:Rana | 2005.06.28 at 02:49 PM
(And I have to add: that's the weirdest trackback!)
Posted by:Rana | 2005.06.28 at 02:50 PM
hurray!
Posted by:qB | 2005.06.28 at 03:39 PM
That is a weird trackback. Maybe that blog makes random tracksbacks?
\*/
Posted by:Daybreak | 2005.06.28 at 04:11 PM
Congrats! A house!
Posted by:KathyR | 2005.06.28 at 04:20 PM
Perhaps it is trackback spam.
Posted by:Jill Smith | 2005.06.28 at 04:53 PM
Yay! Congrats! Nice to see you back!
Posted by:New Kid on the Hallway | 2005.06.28 at 05:23 PM
Glad you're back. I want to hear about the house.
Posted by:jo(e) | 2005.06.28 at 05:49 PM
yay about your house! HOORAY!
Posted by:BrightStar | 2005.06.28 at 06:20 PM
this is so cool
Posted by:leelee | 2005.06.28 at 07:28 PM
Hurrah!
I'm holding out for pictures of the kittens, though.
Posted by:yami | 2005.06.29 at 01:17 AM
It's not trackback spam. Unpartisan.com is a blog aggregator that scans political news feeds and political blog postings, sorting and categorizing them into categories in much the same way that Google News does with regular news. It does this entirely without the aid of a human editor. For example, if Bush makes a speech about the war, the aggregator will gather all stories about the speech and all blog postings related to it, then sort all stories by popularity. It's quite complicated and I'm very proud of it, but sometimes errors are made in categorization (it is a computer, after all, and not a human). I'm still not entirely sure why the algorithm matched this posting to that story, but we're still in beta mode and bugs are being steadily worked out. Thank you for bringing this matter to my attention. For more information, please see the FAQ on Unpartisan.com.
Cameron Brooks
Founder, Unpartisan.com
Posted by:Cameron | 2005.06.30 at 10:32 AM
Well, that's good to know. It does seem like a useful service! :)
Posted by:Rana | 2005.06.30 at 11:12 AM
Indeed. And what a polite response to my allegation of possible trackback spam!
Posted by:Jill Smith | 2005.06.30 at 07:32 PM